Virginia Fairfax Traffic Lawyer Public Highway Suspended Driving
Virginia Fairfax Traffic Lawyer Public Highway Suspended Driving
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Mason v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant sought review of the judgment of the Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia), which convicted defendant of perjury in contravention of Va. Code § 18.2-434 in connection with his testimony at trial on a charge of driving a motor vehicle on a public highway after his privilege to drive had been suspended. Defendant testified at that trial that he had not received notice that his driving license had been suspended.
If you are facing a traffic case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Virginia Fairfax Traffic Lawyer Public Highway Suspended Driving
Holdings:
The Virginia Court made the following holding:
- Va. Code § 18.2-434 provides in part: If any person to whom an oath is lawfully administered on any occasion willfully swear falsely on such occasion touching any material matter or thing, he shall be guilty of perjury.
- In a prosecution under Va. Code § 18.2-434, the Commonwealth of Virginia must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, inter alia, that defendant willfully swore falsely. If the defendant believes the facts stated by him to be true, he may not properly be said to have willfully sworn falsely to such facts.
- If the untrue representation does not touch any material matter or thing in the trial, Va. Code § 18.2-434, the mere falsity of the statement alone will not sustain a perjury conviction. The testimony must have been relevant in the trial of the case, either to the main issue or some collateral issue.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Loudoun, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Fairfax Court House Detail:
Fairfax Circuit Court
4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.
Fairfax County General District Court
4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.
Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court
4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Speeding Stafford Virginia Lawyer Calibration Certificate Vehicle Accuracy
Speeding Stafford Virginia Lawyer Calibration Certificate Vehicle Accuracy
Commonwealth v. Frazer
Facts:
Defendant filed a motion to strike a certificate of calibration of a police vehicle, and objected to the absence of a certificate of calibration of the radar unit in the prosecution of him for speeding.
Speeding Stafford Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the proof of the accuracy of a speedometer was sufficiently established?
Discussions:
Radar used in the arrest was a unit attached to the officer’s motorcycle and he testified that the radar was checked by tuning fork and against the speedometer of his motorcycle. He also testified that the radar was operating accurately under such tests. Defendant objected to the manner in which the accuracy of the radar was determined, citing noncompliance with Va. Code Ann. § 46.1-198(a1). The court overruled the motion and found defendant guilty of speeding. The court held that § 46.1-198(a1) was not applicable because there could not have been a hearsay objection to the testimony of the officer since he was the only one involved in the accuracy test. The court ruled that the use of a calibration certificate to show the accuracy of the speedometer in the vehicle used by a police officer or a defendant was permitted under Va. Code Ann. § 46.1-193.1. The court determined that the proof of the accuracy of a speedometer was sufficiently established by showing it was checked against a calibrated master speedometer and that it was done. The court concluded that the Commonwealth established the accuracy of the type radar used by the tuning fork and the motorcycle speedometer.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
DUI Prince William Virginia Lawyer Drug Possession Intention Stop
DUI Prince William Virginia Lawyer Drug Possession Intention Stop
Cassandra v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant appealed a decision of the Circuit Court of Prince William County (Virginia) that convicted her for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute.
DUI Prince William Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the defendant voluntarily consented to the search of the vehicle?
Discussions:
On appeal from her conviction of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, defendant challenged the stop of her automobile. She contended that she was illegally detained because a state trooper stopped her automobile under a pretext of a drug courier profile. The defendant also contended that consent to search her automobile was obtained by coercion and that certain statements she made were inadmissible because they were made before she was advised of her Miranda rights. The court found that the trial court did not err in finding that the trooper was justified in stopping her vehicle because she met a drug courier profile and she was speeding. The court articulated that the trooper had a justifiable and legal reason (speeding) to stop the vehicle. The court opined that she also voluntarily consented to the search of her vehicle. The court noted that merely advising a defendant that a search warrant could be obtained was not coercion. The court held that the trooper was not required to advise her of her Miranda rights prior to the time she made incriminating statements because she was not in custody, but was merely a subject of a Terry stop.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
DUI Alexandria Virginia Lawyer Speeding Reckless Violation Infraction
DUI Alexandria Virginia Lawyer Speeding Reckless Violation Infraction
Jackson v. Commonwealth
Facts:
In a motion to dismiss, defendant challenged a charge of driving while under the influence of intoxicants in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266 after his speeding charge was converted to reckless driving because it violated Va. Code Ann. §19.2-294.1.
DUI Alexandria Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether conviction for speeding bars the conviction for DUI?
Discussions:
Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants and with speeding 55 miles per hour in a 25 mile per hour zone. Both charges grew out of the same driving activity. Defendant prepaid the speeding charge and claimed that Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862 converted his speeding charge to a reckless driving charge. Defendant alleged that he was convicted of speeding by virtue of this payment of the fines and costs and therefore he could not be prosecuted for the driving under the influence charge because Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294.1 prevented dual convictions of driving under the influence and reckless driving. On review, the court disagreed holding that defendant’s argument required that he be charged with and convicted of reckless driving. The court stated that speeding was a traffic infraction and reckless driving was a misdemeanor. In addition, the court determined that § 19.2-294.1 only applied if defendant was charged with driving under the influence and reckless driving. The court held that where the evidence supported prosecution under two parallel statutes, the Commonwealth had the right to elect under which statute to proceed.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Traffic Stop Prince William Virginia Lawyer Speed Drive
Traffic Stop Prince William Virginia Lawyer Speed Drive
James v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was indicted by a Prince William County grand jury for reckless driving and for the felony failure to stop and provide certain information in violation of Code § 46.2-894. At a bench trial, the circuit court convicted the defendant of reckless driving and fixed his punishment at six months in jail. The circuit court convicted and fixed his punishment at two years imprisonment, which was suspended, and a fine of $ 1,000. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the circuit court. Appellant appealed.
Traffic Stop Prince William Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the driver of a vehicle was involved in an accident within the intendment of Code § 46.2-894, a penal statute?
Discussion:
The court rejecting the court of appeals’ broad definition of “involved,” this court held that to be “involved” in an accident within the meaning of § 46.2-894, there had to be physical contact between appellant’s vehicle and another vehicle, person, or object, or appellant must have been the proximate cause of the accident. Applying this definition to appellant’s circumstances, the Supreme Court held that he was not involved in the accident within the meaning of § 46.2-894. His vehicle did not have any physical contact with the other driver’s vehicle. He was not a cause of the accident; rather, he reduced his speed, and ultimately allowed the other driver to enter into his lane. A law enforcement officer, who testified as an accident reconstruction expert, stated that the other driver had ample opportunity to slow down after merging into appellant’s lane before she lost control of her car, left the road, and collided into two different trees. She apparently did not slow down, however, and the accident resulted in her death and that of her four-year-old child. Hence the court of appeals’ judgment was reversed, and appellant’s conviction for violating § 46.2-894 was dismissed.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Reckless Driving Lee Virginia Lawyer Speeding Prosecution
Reckless Driving Lee Virginia Lawyer Speeding Prosecution
Jeffery v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant was charged with driving while intoxicated and issued a summons for speeding.
Reckless Driving Lee Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the defendant’s speeding violation constituted reckless driving under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862 and that her prosecution for driving while intoxicated was therefore barred
Discussion:
Defendant contended that her speeding violation constituted reckless driving under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862 and that her prosecution for driving while intoxicated was therefore barred by Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294.1, which prohibited conviction of both reckless driving and driving while intoxicated where both charges arose out of the same act or acts. The Commonwealth contended that the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was simply a speeding offense for which a bond could be posted and not the reckless driving offense contemplated by Virginia law. However, the court held that, because defendant was charged with speeding at a rate that constituted reckless driving, the prosecution of the case against her for driving while intoxicated was barred by § 19.2-294.1. The court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, which it treated as a plea in bar.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Reckless Driving Fairfax Virginia Lawyer Expunge Improper
Reckless Driving Fairfax Virginia Lawyer Expunge Improper
White v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Petitioner moved the court to expunge police and court records relating to a sale and/or distribution of marijuana charge as well as a reckless driving charge.
Reckless Driving Fairfax Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the defendant’s motion to expunge ahs to be granted?
Discussion:
Petitioner moved the court to expunge police and court records relating to a sale and/or distribution of marijuana charge as well as a reckless driving charge. The circuit court granted the motion. Petitioner was charged with the sale and/or distribution of marijuana in 2001 and that charge was subsequently nolle prosequi. The parties agreed that petitioner was entitled to expungement of records relating to the marijuana charge pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-392.2(A) (2011). Further, the continued existence and possible dissemination of information relating to that charge might cause a manifest injustice to petitioner. Accordingly, the motion to expunge all police and court records relating to that charge was granted. With regard to the reckless driving charge, he did not plead guilty to reckless driving, nor did the trial court make a finding of guilt as to the reckless driving charge. He was never found guilty of the charge he sought to have expunged. When he pled guilty to improper driving, he pled to an offense separate and distinct from reckless driving. Thus, expungement was proper. Petitioner’s motion to expunge was granted.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Traffic Stop Manassas Virginia Lawyer Drunken Drive
Traffic Stop Manassas Virginia Lawyer Drunken Drive
Michael v. Commonwealth
Facts:
While defendant sat in the driver’s seat of a vehicle stopped at a tollbooth, a police officer approached the vehicle, smelled alcohol, and arrested defendant. After defendant, a habitual offender, was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol, the trial court imposed a felony sentence under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-357(B)(2) because defendant’s drunken driving had allegedly endangered the vehicle’s passengers. Accordingly, defendant sought review, claiming nobody had been endangered and as such, the trial court should have imposed a misdemeanor sentence, pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-357(B)(1). Defendant sought review of a judgment from the Circuit Court of Northampton County (Virginia), which convicted defendant, a habitual offender, of driving under the influence of alcohol and which sentenced defendant as a felon, pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-357(B)(2). In claiming that the drunken driving had endangered nobody, defendant sought imposition of a misdemeanor sentence, pursuant to Va. Code Ann. 46.2-357(B)(1).
Traffic Stop Manassas Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the evidences are to prove that the defendant’s drunken driving had endangered others?
Discussion:
The court held that even though defendant had been negligent in operating the vehicle, defendant’s intoxication had not been such that it had elevated defendant’s conduct to the level of reckless driving. Thus, the court held the evidence had failed to prove that defendant’s drunken driving had endangered others, as required by Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-357(B)(2). In reversing a judgment which sentenced defendant as a felon after convicting defendant, a habitual offender, of driving under the influence of alcohol, the court held that because defendant’s drunken driving had not been reckless, the evidence had not supported the trial court’s finding of endangerment and its imposition of a felony sentence
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Traffic Stop Prince William County Virginia Lawyer Intent Distribute Possession
Traffic Stop Prince William County Virginia Lawyer Intent Distribute Possession
Ruther v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Police stopped and arrested defendant for reckless driving. After spotting cocaine in the car as they looked in the glove compartment for defendant’s operator’s license and vehicle registration, the police arrested defendant for possession. A further search of the car revealed more drugs. Defendant filed a motion to suppress the drugs. The trial court denied the motion, and defendant was convicted for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, possession of marijuana, driving on a suspended license, and speeding. Defendant appealed his conviction by the Circuit Court of the Prince William County (Virginia), for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, possession of marijuana, driving on a suspended license, and speeding.
Traffic Stop Prince William County Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the trial court properly denied the defendant’s suppress motion?
Discussion:
The court affirmed in part and reversed and dismissed in part. The court affirmed the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress, holding that because the police were authorized by Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-81 to arrest defendant for reckless driving, the drugs were legally found in a search incident to a lawful arrest. The court, however, reversed the trial court’s finding convicting defendant of driving with a suspended license, because the record did not show that defendant was aware that his license was suspended. The court reversed and dismissed the trial court’s conviction of defendant for driving with a suspended license, affirmed the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress, and affirmed the trial court’s conviction of defendant for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, possession of marijuana, and speeding
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Reckless Driving Fairfax Virginia Lawyer Traffic Stop Drunk Drive
Reckless Driving Fairfax Virginia Lawyer Traffic Stop Drunk Drive
Roothan v. Commonwealth
Facts:
While defendant sat in the driver’s seat of a vehicle stopped at a tollbooth, a police officer approached the vehicle, smelled alcohol, and arrested defendant. After defendant, a habitual offender, was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol, the trial court imposed a felony sentence under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-357(B)(2) because defendant’s drunken driving had allegedly endangered the vehicle’s passengers. Accordingly, defendant sought review, claiming nobody had been endangered and as such, the trial court should have imposed a misdemeanor sentence, pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-357(B)(1). Defendant sought review of a judgment from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County (Virginia)
Reckless Driving Fairfax Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the trial court properly convicted the defendant for drunken driving?
Discussion:
The court held that even though defendant had been negligent in operating the vehicle, defendant’s intoxication had not been such that it had elevated defendant’s conduct to the level of reckless driving. Thus, the court held the evidence had failed to prove that defendant’s drunken driving had endangered others, as required by Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-357(B)(2). In reversing a judgment which sentenced defendant as a felon after convicting defendant, a habitual offender, of driving under the influence of alcohol, the court held that because defendant’s drunken driving had not been reckless, the evidence had not supported the trial court’s finding of endangerment and its imposition of a felony sentence
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
8:00 AM – 12:00 AM Midnight
Former State Trooper
