Suspended License Rockingham Virginia Lawyer Unauthorized Use
Suspended License Rockingham Virginia Lawyer Unauthorized Use
Francis v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Rockingham County (Virginia), defendant was convicted of a third or subsequent offense of driving on a suspended or revoked license and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and sentenced to five years for unauthorized use and 12 months for driving while suspended. Defendant appealed.
Suspended License Rockingham Virginia Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the trial court erred in admitting, at the guilt phase of trial, an unredacted copy of defendant’s driving transcript from the Department of Motor Vehicles?
Discussion:
Defendant argued that the trial court erred in admitting, at the guilt phase of trial, an unredacted copy of his driving transcript from the Department of Motor Vehicles (Virginia). Defendant objected that the transcript was irrelevant and prejudicial as it contained information unrelated to his prior convictions of driving on a suspended license. The appellate court held that, even assuming the trial court erred in admitting the unredacted transcript, such error did not compel reversal because the evidence overwhelmingly proved defendant guilty of a third or subsequent offense of driving on a suspended license. Defendant testified that his license was suspended when he drove and that he had previously been convicted twice of driving on a suspended license. In addition the Commonwealth introduced two conviction orders indicating defendant’s prior convictions for driving on a suspended license. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Revoked License Virginia Suspended Traffic Lawyers Orange County
Revoked License Virginia Suspended Traffic Lawyers Orange County
Andy v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Orange County (Virginia), defendant was convicted of a third or subsequent offense of driving on a suspended or revoked license and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and sentenced to five years for unauthorized use and 12 months for driving while suspended. Defendant appealed.
Revoked License Virginia Suspended Traffic Lawyers
Issue:
- Whether the trial court erred in admitting his unredacted driving record at the guilt phase of trial?
Discussion:
Defendant argued that the trial court erred in admitting, at the guilt phase of trial, an unredacted copy of his driving transcript from the Department of Motor Vehicles (Virginia). Defendant objected that the transcript was irrelevant and prejudicial as it contained information unrelated to his prior convictions of driving on a suspended license. The appellate court held that, even assuming the trial court erred in admitting the unredacted transcript, such error did not compel reversal because the evidence overwhelmingly proved defendant guilty of a third or subsequent offense of driving on a suspended license. Defendant testified that his license was suspended when he drove and that he had previously been convicted twice of driving on a suspended license. In addition. the Commonwealth introduced two conviction orders indicating defendant’s prior convictions for driving on a suspended license. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket. A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Reckless Driving Virginia Habitual Offender Registration Loudoun County
Reckless Driving Virginia Habitual Offender Registration Loudoun County
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. BRANDLY
Facts:
Defendant appealed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which convicted defendant of operation of a motor vehicle by a habitual offender, driving while intoxicated, reckless driving, and failure to display registration.
Reckless Driving Virginia Habitual Offender Registration
Issue:
- Whether the defendant guilty of operation of a motor vehicle by a habitual offender, driving while intoxicated, reckless driving, and failure to display registration?
Discussion:
The district court finds that defendant guilty of operation of a motor vehicle by a habitual offender, driving while intoxicated, reckless driving, and failure to display registration. On appeal, defendant contended that the district court erred in admitting three documents at her trial. First, defendant alleged that a court order and a Department of Motor Vehicles transcript were not properly authenticated under Virginia law. The court applied federal law and held that the seals and attestations on these documents were sufficient. Defendant also asserted that a record of her previous conviction for driving while intoxicated should have been excluded. State judgments were presumptively valid and defendant offered no evidence to overcome that presumption. The evidence was sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for felonious operation of a motor vehicle by a habitual offender. Finally, defendant asserted that her conviction for reckless driving must have been vacated in light of Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294.1 (Michie Supp. 1999), which prohibits simultaneous convictions for reckless driving and driving while intoxicated. The court agreed and vacated the conviction. Judgment affirmed except as to defendant’s conviction and sentence for reckless driving, which was vacated; the seals and attestations on certain documents were sufficient, defendant’s conviction for felonious operation of a motor vehicle by a habitual offender was supported by sufficient evidence, and defendant could not have been convicted of both reckless driving and driving while intoxicated.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket. A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Reckless Driving Virginia Driver License Suspended Attorneys Louisa County
Reckless Driving Virginia Driver License Suspended Attorneys Louisa County
ANTONY MILL V. COMMONWEALTH
Facts:
Defendant was given a traffic citation for reckless driving, and had a valid driver’s license in his possession. The state trooper later determined that defendant’s license had been suspended at the time of the citation. The trooper obtained a warrant charging defendant with driving with a suspended license. At trial, defendant testified that he had not received notice that his license had been suspended, and the charge was dismissed. Defendant was later indicted for perjury, and the evidence adduced at trial showed that a Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) employee had personally advised defendant that his license had been suspended and the evidence further showed that a copy of the suspension order had been mailed to and received by defendant. Defendant was convicted and sought review. The court affirmed. Defendant argued that his statement was not false because the notice letter was so vague that it did not advise him that his license was suspended. Defendant sought review of the judgment of the Circuit Court of Louisa County (Virginia), which convicted defendant of perjury in contravention of Va. Code § 18.2-434 in connection with his testimony at trial on a charge of driving a motor vehicle on a public highway after his privilege to drive had been suspended. Defendant testified at that trial that he had not received notice that his driving license had been suspended.
Reckless Driving Virginia Driver License Suspended Attorneys
Issue:
- Whether the language of the order, reasonably interpreted, accomplishes a suspension of defendant’s driver’s license?
- Whether the language of the document was confusing, contradictory and vague?
Discussion:
The court found that the letter was a DMV form letter in which inapplicable terms had not been crossed out, but held that when viewed in its entirety, the letter was sufficient to notify defendant that his license was suspended. The court affirmed defendant’s conviction for perjury over his objection that he did not falsely state that he did not know his driver’s license was suspended because the DMV notice letter was so vague that it did not advise him of the suspension.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket. A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Suspended License Virginia Traffic Violation Unlawful Driving Lawyers Louisa County
Suspended License Virginia Traffic Violation Unlawful Driving Lawyers Louisa County
JOHN V COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Facts:
Defendant “involved in a traffic violation” in Louisa County and issued him a summons for reckless driving. At the time, defendant had a valid operator’s license in his possession. The trooper later determined that defendant’s privileges to operate a motor vehicle had been suspended by an order of the Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) issued on October 19, 1977. The trooper then obtained a warrant charging defendant with unlawfully operating “a motor vehicle on [a] public highway after his privilege to drive had been suspended.” Defendant sought review of the judgment of the Circuit Court of Louisa County (Virginia), which convicted defendant of perjury in contravention of Va. Code § 18.2-434 in connection with his testimony at trial on a charge of driving a motor vehicle on a public highway after his privilege to drive had been suspended. Defendant testified at that trial that he had not received notice that his driving license had been suspended. Defendant was given a traffic citation for reckless driving, and had a valid driver’s license in his possession. The state trooper later determined that defendant’s license had been suspended at the time of the citation. The trooper obtained a warrant charging defendant with driving with a suspended license.
Suspended License Virginia Traffic Violation Unlawful Driving Lawyers
Issues:
- Whether the language of the order accomplishes a suspension of defendant’s driver’s license?
Discussion:
At trial, defendant testified that he had not received notice that his license had been suspended, and the charge was dismissed. Defendant was later indicted for perjury, and the evidence adduced at trial showed that a Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) employee had personally advised defendant that his license had been suspended, and the evidence further showed that a copy of the suspension order had been mailed to and received by defendant. Defendant was convicted and sought review. The court affirmed. Defendant argued that his statement was not false because the notice letter was so vague that it did not advise him that his license was suspended. The court found that the letter was a DMV form letter in which inapplicable terms had not been crossed out, but held that when viewed in its entirety, the letter was sufficient to notify defendant that his license was suspended. The court affirmed defendant’s conviction for perjury over his objection that he did not falsely state that he did not know his driver’s license was suspended because the DMV notice letter was so vague that it did not advise him of the suspension.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your traffic ticket. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your traffic ticket. A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your traffic ticket in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Article written by A Sris
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
8:00 AM – 12:00 AM Midnight
Former State Trooper
